Mandatory Sentencing
نویسندگان
چکیده
Adam Graycar Director There is a widely held belief that the imposition of a mandatory sentence for a second or third offence will have a significant deterrent effect on that individual and will send a message to potential offenders. Advocates argue that it will bring consistency in sentencing and appease public concern about crime and punishment. This proposition has been debated vigorously in the community, and has been the subject of numerous research papers. This paper examines the evidence for and against mandatory sentencing and finds that although mandatory sentencing may result in some reduction in crime, it questions whether the costs involved justify the small decrease that may be achieved. Efforts made to turn potential offenders into good citizens may be more productive in earlier stages of their development than seeking to deter criminal behaviour through more rigid sentencing policies. Money spent on early intervention programs, education, and better environmental and product design to reduce opportunities for criminal activity, may be a far more effective way of reducing crime. This paper argues that judges who are publicly accountable for their decisions may be in a better position to ensure that justice is served through a greater understanding of the context of the offence than legislation introducing mandatory sentencing which cannot make allowances for the circumstances associated with the crime in question.
منابع مشابه
Fifteen Years after the Federal Sentencing Revolution: How Mandatory Minimums Have Undermined Effective and Just Narcotics Sentencing Perspectives on the Federal Sentencing Guidelines and Mandatory Sentencing
متن کامل
Making the Crime fit the Penalty: The Role of Prosecutorial Discretion Under Mandatory Minimum Sentencing
This paper empirically documents one way in which prosecutorial discretion can be used to dampen the effects of mandatory minimum sentencing laws. Specifically, I show prosecutors use their discretion over prosecution charges to circumvent a mandatory minimum sentencing law for some defendants, by prosecuting these defendants who were initially arrested for the crime targeted by the sentencing ...
متن کاملThe Effect of Prison Population Size on Crime Rates: Evidence from Cocaine and Marijuana Mandatory Minimum Sentencing
متن کامل
The Abolition of Mandatory Life Imprisonment for Murder: Some Jurisprudential Issues
THIS PAPER CONCERNS SOME JURISPRUDENTIAL ISSUES RAISED BY THE abolition of the mandatory life sentence for murder, a step undertaken in New South Wales in 1982— Crimes (Homicide) Amendment Act 1982, Crimes (Life Sentences) Amendment Act 1989— and Victoria in 1986— Crimes (Amendment) Act 1986. It starts, however, with more general issues of sentencing philosophy. The first main section of this p...
متن کامل